Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Math Every Day

It happens to me that learning arithmetic, particularly analytics and different types of higher science, is a lot of like learning an unknown dialect. Math begins like an unknown dialect, having its own images, definitions, applications, and structures. It is hard to use from the start and requires reiteration, similar to another dialect. One needs to retain images, their capacities and numerous standards, and afterward one needs to rehearse by working numerous issues. Students can't be OK with new dialects (science) until they can utilize it more than once, reliably, and effectively. Math, or another dialect, is as of now existent and the student needs to adjust to it and work in it; the new material won't adjust to the student. One learns a language by tuning in to other people and by perusing, utilizing a word reference, learning the language rules, and what breaks any or those principles. Analytics is comparative. After much practice, understudies can speak with others in their new dialect and extend their capacities with more practice and use, similarly as in science. Those with a decent establishment by means of formal guidance are obviously greater at than those that get it to a great extent, intermittently.â The first can be comprehended and the second gotten lost. Less very much prepared students are restricted in the range and layering of significance their correspondence can include and don't have the instruments for significantly more significant levels of language (science) learning. A solid establishment readies the new dialect speaker or the new analytics understudy for the following stage in their subject’s discipline and for later development, exploration, and creation in that discipline. Arithmetic and language are the equivalent †They have equations and examples; they are correspondence and they are excellent (for example fractal examples and verse). Maybe this is the explanation that the movies â€Å"Close experiences of the third kind† utilized music (exceptionally numerical) and â€Å"Contact† utilized arithmetic as the types of correspondence that demonstrated effective among outsiders and earth individuals.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Causal Effect of Corporate Governance - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Talk about the Causal Effect of Corporate Governance. Answer: Presentation: From the give contextual investigation of Enron, it very well may be seen that there were some major moral issues in the association that contributed generally towards the breakdown of the organization as all these moral issues are significant issues. The major moral infringement for Enron are talked about beneath: The subsidizing plan presented by the Chiefs Financial Officer of the Enron was one of the major moral issues for the organization. The fundamental point of this plan was to build the offer costs of the organization. Be that as it may, the genuine thought process behind the acquaintance of this plan was with increment the administrations individual riches at the costs of the workers. This was a significant moral infringement in Enron (Schwartz 2013). Another major moral infringement for Enron can be found in the field of vital administration. It tends to be seen that Jeff Skilling presented the matter of broadband wherein he didn't have any sort of close to home information in that specific field. Accordingly, he was unable to raise the necessary capital for the execution of the venture. Absence of straightforwardness and responsibility was another major moral infringement for Enron. Toward the start, the administration of Enron was resolved to give the genuine monetary data of the organization to their partners so as to keep up straightforwardness and responsibility. Notwithstanding, in the later phase of the business, it tends to be seen that the administration of the organization began to keep up a wobbly sheet so as to shroud the obligation and risk position of the organization. This procedure was exceptionally deceptive as the partners were denied structure this activity of Enron (Markham 2015). From the gave contextual analysis, it tends to be seen that the bookkeeping firm, Arthur Anderson damaged all the moral standards of bookkeeping so as to help Enron in the outrage. This can be considered as another major moral infringement for Enron. Corporate administration alludes to a conventional example in the associations of explicit rules and standards so the business tasks of the organizations can be run in the most moral manner. The job of morals in corporate administration alludes to the procedure of the utilization of morals in different organization related business tasks of the organizations (Crane and Matten 2016). With the assistance of morals in corporate administration, the administration of the organizations can oversee both the inside and outer moral issues of the organizations. For instance, the job of morals in corporate administration can be found during the time spent dealing with the different issues with the representatives. In such manner, the way toward choosing the representatives should be founded on the ownership of required human capital in the most moral manner (Trong Tuan 2012). Aside from this, the use of morals in corporate administration can be found during the time spent the administration of outside partners of the organizations by the administration. Likewise, with the assistance of morals in corporate administration, business associations can address the issues of capable corporate practices. One of the significant jobs of morals in corporate administration can be found in causing the organizations to work in eco-accommodating way. Then again, with the assistance of morals in corporate administration, the organizations become ready to get responsibility and straightforwardness the procedure of money related announcing (Jo and Harjoto 2012). In this way, in light of the above conversation it tends to be seen that the presentation of morals in corporate administration makes the organizations demonstration in the moral way in each viewpoint. It is the obligation of the monetary supervisors of the organizations to tell all the speculators and investor about any sort of significant material changes in the fiscal summaries. This should be done as the anticipated benefit of the organizations can be diminished because of the material changes. This equivalent idea can be applied on account of Enron. In this circumstance, it should be referenced that the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) uses to tell the associations about any sort of material change in the budget reports of the organizations. On the off chance that this occurs, at that point the chief of Enron would be viewed as progressively moral on the off chance that he masterminded explicit strategies to tell the financial specialists about this material change. This should be possible in different manners. To begin with, the monetary oversee can orchestrate a gathering with the financial specialists and investors of the organizations to let them tell that the benefit le vel won't be the equivalent because of significant material change. Second, he can orchestrate an official statement to inform the financial specialists and investors the equivalent (Brigham and Houston 2012). The Enron oversees could take certain activities to stay away from liquidation. To start with, it was a significant defective advance for Enron to take their business in California. It very well may be seen that the test of Enron about the deregulation in California didn't work and the organization went towards chapter 11. In this way, the chiefs were required to close down the business in California to stay away from liquidation. Second, the administrators of Enron expected to make a move to stop the subsidizing plan presented by the Chief Finance Officer of the organization, as it was one of the significant reasons of the chapter 11 of the organization. Third, the directors of Enron expected to make a move against the upkeep of wobbly sheet. The administrators of Enron required to take these activities. On the off chance that I was the CEO of Enron, I would make it sure that the organization received the reasonable bookkeeping arrangement with the goal that the partners of the organization don't need to be denied. The foundation of reasonable bookkeeping strategies would get straightforwardness and responsibility the organization and would be useful to maintain a strategic distance from insolvency. Furthermore, I would not keep up any sort of cockeyed sheet to control the budgetary situation of the organization. I would attempt to remember morals for corporate administration with the goal that all the business activities of the organization can be run in the moral way. In conclusion, I would not receive any sort of forceful bookkeeping approaches for the organization. References Brigham, E.F. also, Houston, J.F., 2012.Fundamentals of money related administration. Cengage Learning. Crane, A. what's more, Matten, D., 2016.Business morals: Managing corporate citizenship and manageability in the time of globalization. Oxford University Press. Jo, H. what's more, Harjoto, M.A., 2012. The causal impact of corporate administration on corporate social responsibility.Journal of business ethics,106(1), pp.53-72. Markham, J.W., 2015.A money related history of present day US corporate outrages: From Enron to change. Routledge. Schwartz, M.S., 2013. Creating and supporting a moral corporate culture: The center elements.Business Horizons,56(1), pp.39-50. Trong Tuan, L., 2012. Corporate social duty, morals, and corporate governance.Social Responsibility Journal,8(4), pp.547-560.

Friday, August 21, 2020

Show, Dont Tell! (the College Essay, Pt. 2)

Show, Don’t Tell! (the College Essay, Pt. 2) QUOTE: (i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. (ii) Never use a long word where a short one will do. (iii) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. (iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active. (v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. (vi) Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous. -excerpt from George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946. So once upon a time, I wrote a blog comparing the college essay to froyo. Since then, the application has been revised, and although I still believe in the merits of the first blog in regards to a long college admissions essay (500-1000 words), it definitely doesnt apply completely to the new short-answer system that MIT adopted. A few months ago, I created a bogus account on my.mit.edu so I can actually catch a glimpse at what the new application looks like (it really doesnt look that different, ha) and Ive been thinking about how I would approach these essays. Although nothing here is the product of intense cognition, I thought Id share some of my views on these small essays. Essentially, you have 5 mini-essays What You Do For Pleasure (pleasure 100 words), Department at MIT (department 100 words), What You Do Thats Creative (creativity 250 words), World You Come From (world 250 words), Significant Challenge (challenge 250 words), and thats it! Less than 1000 words total. The easy things first the Pleasure and the Department prompts are not really essays, but short answers, so they can be easily answered. My advice is just to go ahead and be honest with them (well, you should be honest in your entire application ;P), especially with the Pleasure essay. The admission officers (adcoms) are not looking for standard answers, and you wont get brownie points by putting down programming, building robots, or other MIT-y answers (although they also definitely wont penalize you if they do happen to be things that you do for fun). Just be honest! Many people stress out about the Department essay, but I can tell you that MIT DOES NOT admit on a quota, and you WILL NOT be penalized by which department you put down on that blank (I dont know how many emails Ive gotten on this subject already seriously, the adcoms are not lying at you, and no there is no conspiracy either). Therefore, you will not seem more impressive if you put down Philosophy, over, say, Mechanical Engineering. When I applied, I put down Chemical Engineering (oh, such were the days of my innocent youth, when I believed that Chemistry was trivial), but now Im happily a Biology (and pending History) major. Your interests may shift after you enroll at MIT (and realize how brutal some of the courses here can be), and thats perfectly fine! So dont worry too much. For the Creativity essay, I would encourage you to look at the connotation of creativity from a new angle (in a sense, be creative about exploring creativity :P). You can go broader than physical things like creative projects or creative inventions. I would investigate writing about creative ideas, creative ways of looking at things, creative ways of solving problems, for example. I wrote about a concrete research project I did when I applied, but I thought that was quite boring in comparison to the other things that could have written about, so I encourage you to explore this topic a bit further. :) Ah ok, now we come to the challenging 250-word essays. So back in the day, we had a choice between these two essays to write a long essay on, but I guess now theyre requiring you write on both of them, but as shorter essays. Actually, I really enjoyed the world essay and I thought it was the one of the best prompts out of the prompts for the 15 colleges that I applied to (number one was still Stanfords photograph prompt I loved it. Sorry MIT :P). The challenge now, however, is how to condense all the things you want to convey into mere 250 words. In order for me to see what a 250 word word limit is really like, I wrote a 250 word essay. Not on MITs prompts, though. He held up the sheet of wrinkled paper, his eyes in silent protest. The tattered bill requested 13,800 dollars for a three-day hospital stay. Why call the ambulance? Just leave me alone! the frail old man muttered. Just a week ago, Mr. Vu suffered a stroke that required hospitalization. Because he could not understand English, Mr. Vu had not applied for health insurance, resulting in the exorbitant bill. An internship at an Asian clinic opened my eyes to the untold story of limited-English proficiency patients, who often struggle to obtain health care in a maze of foreign forms and convoluted policies. Suffering from a worsening stomachache, Mrs. Wong was neglected in the county hospital for over two hours, unable to flag down a passing nurse for assistance because of the language barrier. Clutching a X-Ray order, Mr. Park searched in vain for Radiology in a blinding flurry of English letters. Over the summer, these stories became too common accounts of immigrants fighting for their right to care in a shockingly monolingual health system. After the internship, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed as a Mandarin health interpreter in November. I wanted to change the status quo. My experiences this summer solidified my conviction of entering into public health, especially immigrant health, as my future course of study. America has long prided itself as a melting pot of cultures. Isnt it only fitting that there exists equitable access to health care, regardless of the language spoken? The word limit is kinda short. Now, a disclaimer: I want to stay that this is not intended to be a model essay (I think the ending can use some more work, among other things), but I thought this would be easier in illustrating a point. If you look at the essay, I like going narrative - point - how it connects to me. In fact, this is what I use for most of my essays :3 Heres the same essay, deliberately made worse (but to illustrate a very common problem in college application essays): Last summer, I worked in an Asian clinic in Oakland, California. Over the course of the summer, I realized the plight of immigrants when it comes to obtaining equitable health care. In the modern health industry, immigrants and other residents who possess limited English proficiency are often overlooked because of their inability to communicate their symptoms to the doctor and complete paperwork in English. This problem is exacerbated when they cannot apply for health insurance, resulting in exorbitant health bills. In a country that claims to be the melting pot of cultures, this kind of neglect is no longer acceptable. Many patients suffer extended waits in the hospital, unable to obtain assistance. It is possible that a worsening stomachache is the initial sign for appendicitis, which needs to be treated expeditiously. Often, hospital signs are also not translated into other languages, making navigation difficult for elderly patients. These scenes are played across hospitals in the nation everyday. After my experiences this summer, I realized that I wanted to channel my energy into the revitalization of this system. It is no longer sufficient for us to stand on the sidelines and watch. To this end, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed as a Mandarin health interpreter. I hope I will be able to contribute my efforts to the field of public health, especially immigrant health, in the future. These patients cannot afford to passively wait for language-accessible care and continue to sacrifice their right to treatment. Also 250 words, but this essay is riddled with problems, many of which Orwell pointed out in the blurb above. 1. The essay is filled with extraneous and needlessly difficult words. (I wanted to channel my energy into the revitalization of this system) 2. The essay lacks a personal voice its very passive (These scenes are played, immigrants are often overlooked, the problem is exacerbated) 3. The essay never shows it only tells. Show, dont tell! I cant emphasize this enough. This essay points out many problems of the health care system, but doesnt offer any examples of the problems. At the end of the day, which essay will readers remember better? An essay that speaks in general terms or Mr. Vu with his bill? Personally, I think after MIT made the switch from the long essay to short essays, this point is even more pertinent. You just cant afford to waste words speaking in vague terms that doesnt convey much in terms of meaning. When adcoms read thousands of essays on end, you need to stand out. Ideally, your essay should pack enough punch (thats a cliche :P) so that your readers have a take-home message (another cliche :P). Simply put, you need something memorable about your essay. If you feel bored writing your essay, chances are that the person reading your essay will be bored too. Make it vivid let your story shine. Finally, the other point I want to convey: Trim the extra fat! I narrowed down the first essay from over 400 words to just 250. Chances are, you can do the same too. The second essay is plagued with extraneous words, and actually it can be narrowed down to just this without loss of meaning: Last summer, I worked in an Asian clinic, where I realized the struggle of immigrants in obtaining equitable health care because of the language barrier. They often cannot apply for health insurance, resulting in exorbitant bills. This is not acceptable in America, which claims to be a melting pot of cultures. Many patients suffer long waits in the hospital, unable to get help. A worsening stomachache can lead to appendicitis that requires rapid treatment. Often, signs are only written in English, making navigation difficult for elderly patients. It is no longer sufficient for me stand on the sidelines I want to make a difference. To this end, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed in Mandarin. Eventually, I hope I can work in the field of public health, especially immigrant health. These patients cannot afford to passively wait for language-accessible care and continue to sacrifice their right to treatment. This new essay is only 154 words. Although it definitely sounds stilted and shouldnt be submitted as a complete essay, it still goes to show how much excess fat one can usually trim from a typical essay. Not to reiterate myself too much from the previous blog that I wrote, but the effective essay, IMO, is the essay that really shows who you are, where youre coming from, and what your loves are in your own voice. Both the world and the challenges essay are structured so that its focused on you and your stories. Use these opportunities to tell a story to convey who you are. Theres no need to repackage your tale in fancy rhetoric or educated vocabulary. Just as we see in world literature: often the best stories are, really, the simplest stories.

Show, Dont Tell! (the College Essay, Pt. 2)

Show, Don’t Tell! (the College Essay, Pt. 2) QUOTE: (i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. (ii) Never use a long word where a short one will do. (iii) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. (iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active. (v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. (vi) Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous. -excerpt from George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946. So once upon a time, I wrote a blog comparing the college essay to froyo. Since then, the application has been revised, and although I still believe in the merits of the first blog in regards to a long college admissions essay (500-1000 words), it definitely doesnt apply completely to the new short-answer system that MIT adopted. A few months ago, I created a bogus account on my.mit.edu so I can actually catch a glimpse at what the new application looks like (it really doesnt look that different, ha) and Ive been thinking about how I would approach these essays. Although nothing here is the product of intense cognition, I thought Id share some of my views on these small essays. Essentially, you have 5 mini-essays What You Do For Pleasure (pleasure 100 words), Department at MIT (department 100 words), What You Do Thats Creative (creativity 250 words), World You Come From (world 250 words), Significant Challenge (challenge 250 words), and thats it! Less than 1000 words total. The easy things first the Pleasure and the Department prompts are not really essays, but short answers, so they can be easily answered. My advice is just to go ahead and be honest with them (well, you should be honest in your entire application ;P), especially with the Pleasure essay. The admission officers (adcoms) are not looking for standard answers, and you wont get brownie points by putting down programming, building robots, or other MIT-y answers (although they also definitely wont penalize you if they do happen to be things that you do for fun). Just be honest! Many people stress out about the Department essay, but I can tell you that MIT DOES NOT admit on a quota, and you WILL NOT be penalized by which department you put down on that blank (I dont know how many emails Ive gotten on this subject already seriously, the adcoms are not lying at you, and no there is no conspiracy either). Therefore, you will not seem more impressive if you put down Philosophy, over, say, Mechanical Engineering. When I applied, I put down Chemical Engineering (oh, such were the days of my innocent youth, when I believed that Chemistry was trivial), but now Im happily a Biology (and pending History) major. Your interests may shift after you enroll at MIT (and realize how brutal some of the courses here can be), and thats perfectly fine! So dont worry too much. For the Creativity essay, I would encourage you to look at the connotation of creativity from a new angle (in a sense, be creative about exploring creativity :P). You can go broader than physical things like creative projects or creative inventions. I would investigate writing about creative ideas, creative ways of looking at things, creative ways of solving problems, for example. I wrote about a concrete research project I did when I applied, but I thought that was quite boring in comparison to the other things that could have written about, so I encourage you to explore this topic a bit further. :) Ah ok, now we come to the challenging 250-word essays. So back in the day, we had a choice between these two essays to write a long essay on, but I guess now theyre requiring you write on both of them, but as shorter essays. Actually, I really enjoyed the world essay and I thought it was the one of the best prompts out of the prompts for the 15 colleges that I applied to (number one was still Stanfords photograph prompt I loved it. Sorry MIT :P). The challenge now, however, is how to condense all the things you want to convey into mere 250 words. In order for me to see what a 250 word word limit is really like, I wrote a 250 word essay. Not on MITs prompts, though. He held up the sheet of wrinkled paper, his eyes in silent protest. The tattered bill requested 13,800 dollars for a three-day hospital stay. Why call the ambulance? Just leave me alone! the frail old man muttered. Just a week ago, Mr. Vu suffered a stroke that required hospitalization. Because he could not understand English, Mr. Vu had not applied for health insurance, resulting in the exorbitant bill. An internship at an Asian clinic opened my eyes to the untold story of limited-English proficiency patients, who often struggle to obtain health care in a maze of foreign forms and convoluted policies. Suffering from a worsening stomachache, Mrs. Wong was neglected in the county hospital for over two hours, unable to flag down a passing nurse for assistance because of the language barrier. Clutching a X-Ray order, Mr. Park searched in vain for Radiology in a blinding flurry of English letters. Over the summer, these stories became too common accounts of immigrants fighting for their right to care in a shockingly monolingual health system. After the internship, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed as a Mandarin health interpreter in November. I wanted to change the status quo. My experiences this summer solidified my conviction of entering into public health, especially immigrant health, as my future course of study. America has long prided itself as a melting pot of cultures. Isnt it only fitting that there exists equitable access to health care, regardless of the language spoken? The word limit is kinda short. Now, a disclaimer: I want to stay that this is not intended to be a model essay (I think the ending can use some more work, among other things), but I thought this would be easier in illustrating a point. If you look at the essay, I like going narrative - point - how it connects to me. In fact, this is what I use for most of my essays :3 Heres the same essay, deliberately made worse (but to illustrate a very common problem in college application essays): Last summer, I worked in an Asian clinic in Oakland, California. Over the course of the summer, I realized the plight of immigrants when it comes to obtaining equitable health care. In the modern health industry, immigrants and other residents who possess limited English proficiency are often overlooked because of their inability to communicate their symptoms to the doctor and complete paperwork in English. This problem is exacerbated when they cannot apply for health insurance, resulting in exorbitant health bills. In a country that claims to be the melting pot of cultures, this kind of neglect is no longer acceptable. Many patients suffer extended waits in the hospital, unable to obtain assistance. It is possible that a worsening stomachache is the initial sign for appendicitis, which needs to be treated expeditiously. Often, hospital signs are also not translated into other languages, making navigation difficult for elderly patients. These scenes are played across hospitals in the nation everyday. After my experiences this summer, I realized that I wanted to channel my energy into the revitalization of this system. It is no longer sufficient for us to stand on the sidelines and watch. To this end, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed as a Mandarin health interpreter. I hope I will be able to contribute my efforts to the field of public health, especially immigrant health, in the future. These patients cannot afford to passively wait for language-accessible care and continue to sacrifice their right to treatment. Also 250 words, but this essay is riddled with problems, many of which Orwell pointed out in the blurb above. 1. The essay is filled with extraneous and needlessly difficult words. (I wanted to channel my energy into the revitalization of this system) 2. The essay lacks a personal voice its very passive (These scenes are played, immigrants are often overlooked, the problem is exacerbated) 3. The essay never shows it only tells. Show, dont tell! I cant emphasize this enough. This essay points out many problems of the health care system, but doesnt offer any examples of the problems. At the end of the day, which essay will readers remember better? An essay that speaks in general terms or Mr. Vu with his bill? Personally, I think after MIT made the switch from the long essay to short essays, this point is even more pertinent. You just cant afford to waste words speaking in vague terms that doesnt convey much in terms of meaning. When adcoms read thousands of essays on end, you need to stand out. Ideally, your essay should pack enough punch (thats a cliche :P) so that your readers have a take-home message (another cliche :P). Simply put, you need something memorable about your essay. If you feel bored writing your essay, chances are that the person reading your essay will be bored too. Make it vivid let your story shine. Finally, the other point I want to convey: Trim the extra fat! I narrowed down the first essay from over 400 words to just 250. Chances are, you can do the same too. The second essay is plagued with extraneous words, and actually it can be narrowed down to just this without loss of meaning: Last summer, I worked in an Asian clinic, where I realized the struggle of immigrants in obtaining equitable health care because of the language barrier. They often cannot apply for health insurance, resulting in exorbitant bills. This is not acceptable in America, which claims to be a melting pot of cultures. Many patients suffer long waits in the hospital, unable to get help. A worsening stomachache can lead to appendicitis that requires rapid treatment. Often, signs are only written in English, making navigation difficult for elderly patients. It is no longer sufficient for me stand on the sidelines I want to make a difference. To this end, I participated in a medical interpretation training program and was licensed in Mandarin. Eventually, I hope I can work in the field of public health, especially immigrant health. These patients cannot afford to passively wait for language-accessible care and continue to sacrifice their right to treatment. This new essay is only 154 words. Although it definitely sounds stilted and shouldnt be submitted as a complete essay, it still goes to show how much excess fat one can usually trim from a typical essay. Not to reiterate myself too much from the previous blog that I wrote, but the effective essay, IMO, is the essay that really shows who you are, where youre coming from, and what your loves are in your own voice. Both the world and the challenges essay are structured so that its focused on you and your stories. Use these opportunities to tell a story to convey who you are. Theres no need to repackage your tale in fancy rhetoric or educated vocabulary. Just as we see in world literature: often the best stories are, really, the simplest stories.

Sunday, May 24, 2020

A Refutation of Gilbert and Gubars Anti-Christian Perspective of Jane Eyre - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1762 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Jane Eyre Essay Did you like this example? Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubars The Madwoman in the Attic is the seminal analysis of Jane Eyre, particularly with regards to feminism. The two assert that somehow Jane intentionally subverts not only social norms, but fundamental tenets of Christian morality, as though Christianity were by nature at odds with feminism, or even women themselves. This opinion is far from a recent development, seeing as Gilbert and Gubar cite several contemporary critics of Bront, which call the novel anti-Christian. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Refutation of Gilbert and Gubars Anti-Christian Perspective of Jane Eyre" essay for you Create order In truth, Jane is a highly virtuous and principled character. These are the qualities which in actuality make her a feminist role model, rather than mere rebellion against the status quo. Jane is morally and ethically superior to all but St. John, who she more than holds her own against. Janes Christianity is the foundation of her character, and Gilbert and Gubars analysis rests on uneven ground because of it. Since its publication in the mid-nineteenth century, Jane Eyre has been the subject of much controversy so far as Christian ethics are concerned. Jane herself was described by contemporary critic Elizabeth Rigby as being undisciplined and unregenerate (or unsaved), with the novel itself being preeminently anti-Christian (Gilbert and Gubar 1). This supposedly heathenesque bent, according to Gilbert and Gubar, comes from a refusal to accept the forms and standards of society in short rebellious feminism (1). The two waste no time linking their own analyses with these. They readily agree, Perhaps they were correct in their response to the book (Gilbert and Gubar 1). Charlotte Bront herself however, defended her writing passionately and authoritatively, admitting an intentional subversion of gender-norms, but declaring in the second edition of Jane Eyre that Conventionality is not morality. Self-righteousness is not religion. To attack the first is not to assail the last. To pluck the ma sk from the face of the Pharisee, is not to lift an impious hand to the Crown of Thorns (Griesinger 5). In short, Bront was a Christian, through and through, as is her titular heroine Jane Eyre. Virtue being essential to discussions of faithfulness, it seems appropriate to me that Jane Eyres Christianity ought to be validated by an analysis of her moral character; something which contemporary critics, as well as Gilbert and Gubar, not only failed to acknowledge, but adamantly rejected. Gilbert and Gubar in particular connect Jane on a symbolic level with Bertha Mason, a character motivated by unbridled passion, governed by madness and violence. Marriage is one example used by Gilbert and Gubar as an analogy for principle, which, according to them Jane rejects. They state that St. John wants to imprison the resolute wild thing that is [Janes] soul in the ultimate cell, the iron shroud of principle (Gilbert and Gubar 11). Here they take things wildly out of context, forgetting the fact that Jane only finds herself in this predicament because she herself is a woman of principle in the first place. Jane leaves Rochester against her own will, on the grounds of principle and Chris tian decency. She refuses to play mistress to a married man (Bront Ch. 27). Janes virtue and faith both are evident throughout the entirety of the novel, as much as her feminist desires for equality. While Jane may temperately rebel against the status quo, she does not rebel against principle. It is not a prison to her. Gilbert and Gubars presumption of an incompatibility between faith and feminism is based upon a flawed understanding of Christian ideals of submission. This is why I bring up their comparison of marriage with prison. To Gilbert and Gubar, as well as contemporaries of Bront, marriage equals female subservience, and equality of the sexes is therefore incompatible with Christianity. The conclusion treats neither religion nor feminism with the proper modicum of respect and understanding. Gilbert and Gubar contend that Janes whole life-pilgrimage has, of course, prepared her to be angry at Rochesters and societys, [lovingly tyrannical] concept of marriage (Gilbert and Gubar 7). But who is to say that Rochesters and Christianitys are one in the same? The most striking, audaciously eloquent line in all of Bronts novel is when Jane challenges Rochester, just prior to his proposal, exclaiming it is my spirit that addresses your spirit as if we stood at Gods feet, equal, as we are! (Bront Ch. 23). To certain nineteenth century critics, this would have been seen as a grievous theological error, if not outright heresy. Gilbert and Gubar see it as a virtuous triumph of feminism, but still as anti-Christian. They rightly contend that Though in one sense Jane and Rochester begin their relationship as master and servant in another they begin as spiritual equals (Gilbert and Gubar 5). What they fail to recognize, is that spiritual equality is the Christian state of men and women. Such an analysis is hardly at odds with Christian values, or suggests any sort of innate rebelliousness. Long before Charlotte Brontes brand of feminism, Matthew Henry wrote in his Commentary on the Whole Bible That the woman was made of a rib out of the side of Ad am; not made out of his head to rule over him, nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by him, but out of his side to be equal with him (Henry 7). While one can readily see through an examination of scripture that equality of the sexes has never been anti-Christian, it stands to reason that Jane Eyres brand of emerging biblical feminism as Emily Griesinger calls it, contains a great deal of theological and cultural complexity (19). This is made evident by Janes relationship with her cousin St. John, his proposal, her rejection, and ultimately the supernatural events which occur bringing Jane and Rochester back together. When St. John makes his final proposal, Jane prays earnestly for guidance and direction. She pleads with the Almighty for some sort of intervention. She cries to heaven, Show me, show me the path! and indeed He does (Bront Ch. 36). Jane hears the voice of Rochester, and she speaks to him in kind, across miles and miles of space. Its a miraculous answer to prayer, and one for which Jane immediately gives worship and thanksgiving, contrary to assertions made by Bronts critics. Gilbert and Gubar admit as that Christian morality is a focus of the novel, but contend that Janes inward sense of morality is superior to the external one, the Christian one. They see St. John as symbolic of this supposedly inferior morality, and Janes hearing Rochester as her inward moral compass. The conclusion of the novel refutes this however. Whereas Gilbert and Gubar see the climaxs miraculous intervention as being somehow tied to Janes subconscious, Bront makes it abundantly clear that Providence makes the final decision. Jerome Beaty points out, the notion that the voice is only the product of her excitement is almost immediately denied (Beaty 4). Janes love for Rochester was never rebellious. It was always part of Gods plan, which Jane chooses to accept. Beaty uses these events in his own rejection of the anti-Christian labels applied to the novel. He points out that [Jane] does not depart from the religious, certainly not the Providentialist tenets, and the novel does not force her to choose between religion and life or love (Beaty 4). Frankly, critics are wrong to assert as much. Janes final decision is not one of rebellion, but of submission; submission to God. Hardly anti-Christian, rebellious sentiment, Jane readily submits to the will of God the moment she is certain of it. Jane ends her story, not independent, but wholly dependent on the hand of God. She learns the truth of the proverb; In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths (Authorized King James Version, Prov. 3.6). In conclusion, Emily Griesinger asserts that Jane Eyres Christianity is far more reminiscent of evangelicalism, which has since taken much of Christianity by storm. She writes that Evangelical religion opposed formalism, a type of spirituality that favored outward forms, decent and orderly, over inward heart faith where the Spirit could not be easily contained and often spilled over (Griesinger 8). The fact that Jane Eyre is a woman directly led by the Holy Ghost and not by the church is likely what her critics found so offensive. Jane Eyres Christianity is not an anti-biblical one, but rather one ahead of its time. It is Janes ability to discern the voice of God for herself, suggests Griesinger, that makes her a Christian feminist icon. She needs no man, namely St. John, to explain the will of God for her life. She prays, and she finds it. Maria LaMonaca writes that because of this, Jane demonstrates that women must experience God directly (LaMonaca 8). Near the novels end, Jane refers to Paul and Silas miraculous escape from prison as not unlike her own experience. In the story, Paul and Silas, in an evening of prayer and praise, are loosed from jail by a miraculous earthquake. Jane herself, through prayer, is loosed from the prison of her own indecision. Like with Paul and Silas, Janes escape came by divine intervention in the midst of principled submission, not human rebelliousness. In such, she is exemplary of Christian virtue. Jane Eyre is at once a God fearing woman of principle and a feminist icon. Gilbert and Gubar may get a great deal right in their analysis, but theyre wrong to connect feminism with Brontes critics. They unnecessarily place themselves at odds with an ideology which has done more for the cause of equality than any other, seeing as it was the Apostle Paul who proclaimed There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus (Author ized King James Version, Gal. 3.23, emphasis mine). Works Cited Beaty, Jerome. St. Johns Way and the Wayward Reader. PDF file. Gilbert, Sandra M. and Susan Gubar. From A Dialogue of Self and Soul: Plain9 Janes Progress. Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 1979. PDF file. Griesinger, Emily. Charlotte Bronts Religion: Faith, Feminism, and Jane Eyre. Christianity and Literature, vol. 58, no. 1, 2008, pp. 29â€Å"59. EBSCOhost, login.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/login?auth=shibburl=https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/login.aspx?direct=truedb=mzhAN=2008653303site=ehost-livescope=site. LaMonaca, Maria. Janes Crown of Thorns: Feminism and Christianity in Jane Eyre. Studies in the Novel, vol. 34, no. 3, 2002, pp. 245â€Å"63. EBSCOhost, login.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/login?auth=shibburl=https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/login.aspx?direct=truedb=mzhAN=2002532785site=ehost-livescope=site.

Thursday, May 14, 2020

The Meaning of Innuendo, Definition and Examples

Innuendo is a subtle or indirect observation about a person or thing, usually of a salacious, critical, or disparaging nature. Also called insinuation. In An Account of Innuendo, Bruce Fraser defines the term as an implied message in the form of an allegation whose content constitutes some sort of unwanted ascription towards the target of the comment (Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, 2001). As T. Edward Damer has noted, The force of this fallacy lies in the impression created that some veiled claim is true, although no evidence is presented to support such a view (Attacking Faulty Reasoning, 2009). Pronunciation   in-YOO-en-doe Etymology From the Latin, by hinting Examples and Observations The informal fallacy of innuendo  consists of implying a judgment, usually derogatory, by hinting. No argument is offered. Instead  the  audience is invited by suggestion, by a nod and a wink, to make the assumption. Someone asks, Where is Jones? Did he get fired or something? Someone answers, Not yet.  By innuendo, the response  numbers Joness days. The political candidate who distributes a brochure promising to restore honesty and integrity to an office has suggested, without presenting any argument, that the incumbent is crooked. - Joel Rudinow and Vincent E. Barry,  Invitation to Critical Thinking, 6th ed. Thomson Wadsworth, 2008 Sexual come-ons are a classic example [of innuendo]. Would you like to come up and see my etchings? has been recognized as a double entendre for so long that by 1939, James Thurber could draw a cartoon of a hapless man in an apartment lobby saying to his date, You wait here, and Ill bring the etchings down.​ The veiled threat also has a stereotype: the Mafia wiseguy offering protection with the soft sell, Nice store you got there. Would be a real shame if something happened to it. Traffic cops sometimes face not-so-innocent questions like, Gee, Officer, is there some way I could pay the fine right here? - Steven Pinker, Words Dont Mean What They Mean, Time, September 6, 2007 How to Detect Innuendo To detect innuendo, one has to read between the lines of the written or spoken discourse in a given case and draw out by implicature conclusions that are meant to be inferred by a reader or audience. This is done by reconstructing the argument as a contribution to a conversation, a conventionalized type of dialogue, in which the speaker and hearer (or reader) are supposedly engaged. In such a context, speaker and hearer may be presumed to share common knowledge and expectations and cooperatively to take part in the conversation at its different stages, by taking turns making kinds of moves called speech acts, for example, questioning and replying, asking for clarification or justification of an assertion. - Douglas Walton, One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. State University of New York Press, 1999 Erving Goffman on the Language of Hint Tact in regard to face-work often relies for its operation on a tacit agreement to do business through the language of hint--the language of innuendo, ambiguities, well-placed pauses, carefully worded jokes, and so on. The rule regarding this unofficial kind of communication is that the sender ought not to act as if he had officially conveyed the message he has hinted at, while the recipients have the right and the obligation to act as if they have not officially received the message contained in the hint. Hinted communication, then, is deniable communication; it need not be faced up to. - Erving Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Aldine, 1967 Innuendo in Political Discourse Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. - President George W. Bush, speech to the members of the Knesset in Jerusalem, May 15, 2008 Bush was speaking of appeasement against those who would negotiate with terrorists. The White House spokeswoman, with a straight face, claimed the reference was not to Sen. Barack Obama. - John Mashek, Bush, Obama, and the Hitler Card. U.S. News, May 16, 2008 Our nation stands at a fork in the political road. In one direction, lies a land of slander and scare; the land of sly innuendo, the poison pen, the anonymous phone call and hustling, pushing, shoving; the land of smash and grab and anything to win. This is Nixonland. But I say to you that it is not America. - Adlai E. Stevenson II, written during his second presidential campaign in 1956 The Lighter Side of Sexual Innuendo Norman: (leers, grinning) Your wife interested in er . . . (waggles head, leans across) photographs, eh? Know what I mean? Photographs, he asked him knowingly. Him: Photography? Norman: Yes. Nudge nudge. Snap snap. Grin grin, wink wink, say no more. Him: Holiday snaps? Norman: Could be, could be taken on holiday. Could be, yes--swimming costumes. Know what I mean? Candid photography. Know what I mean, nudge nudge. Him: No, no we dont have a camera. Norman: Oh. Still (slaps hands lightly twice) Woah! Eh? Wo-oah! Eh? Him: Look, are you insinuating something? Norman: Oh . . . no . . . no . . . Yes. Him: Well? Norman: Well. I mean. Er, I mean. Youre a man of the world, arent you . . . I mean, er, youve er . . . youve been there havent you . . . I mean youve been around . . . eh? Him: What do you mean? Norman: Well, I mean, like youve er . . . youve done it . . . I mean like, you know . . . youve . . . er . . . youve slept . . . with a lady. Him: Yes. Norman: Whats it like? - Eric Idle and Terry Jones, episode three of Monty Pythons Flying Circus, 1969

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Heritable Genetic Information In Escherichia Coli In...

Heritable Genetic Information in Escherichia Coli in Transformation and Deoxyribonucleic Acid A report for Biology 2000 written by Alana Pay : 001196733 Introduction Griffin was a scientist that showed that there was a non-living component to heritability between organisms, although he had not yet discovered what exactly was the heritable component. However, during this time period, it was a common belief that the heritable material was contained within the protein of the organism, not the DNA that is now held in the truth. In the Avery and company experiment, they expanded Griffin research to pinpoint the exact location of the heritable information by breaking down cell components until the final product allowing transformation was†¦show more content†¦The experiment completed by Stanley et al, also used the transformational effectiveness of E.Coli to complete their R-Factor DNA study, so the effectiveness of using E.Coli in this type of experiment is well documented. (Stanley et al, 1972) The antibiotic that was used in our replication experiment was kanamycin, which is a amino-glycoside and it proceeds to block the areas that initiat ion complexes may occur. (National Center, 2017) A model system allows us to witness the effects of an experiment in many generations and in an organism that grows in a very quick fashion. The genetic growth is generally very similar to that of humans so that we may compare and contrast what may happen in humans, or what will before we start clinical trials of certain chemicals or antibiotics, in this case, that may have a positive or negative impact on the human populace. The objective of this experiment is to conclude that the results of Griffin and Avery et al, can be duplicated in a way that will allow us to corroborate their results. The null hypothesis that this repeated experiment revolved around was that the DNA involved from the E. Coli would not undergo transformation and therefore grow a strain, which means that there would be growth on any of the plated specimens. This leads to the alternative hypothesis that only the plates that involved the DNase would not have growth as it has the heritable genetic information that would allow the transformation to occur andShow MoreRelatedThe Theory Of Bacterial Transformation1417 Words   |  6 PagesBackground theory: Bacterial transformation is a versatile tool of central importance to molecular biology (The American Phytopathological Society, 2016; The Biotechnology Education Company, 2003). It is a process whereby bacterial cells take up and express exogenous DNA, resulting in the expression of a newly acquired genetic trait that is both stable and heritable (The Biotechnology Education Company, 2003; Bruce Roe, n.d.). For transformation to take place, the bacterial cells must enter a particularRead MoreThemes in the Study of Life5755 Words   |  24 Pagessimple, one-sentence definition. ââ€"‹ We recognize life by what living things do. Concept 1.1 The themes of this book make connections across different areas of biology. †¢ Eight unifying themes will help you organize and make sense of biological information. Theme 1: New properties emerge at each level in the biological hierarchy. †¢ Each level of biological organization has emergent properties. †¢ Biological organization is based on a hierarchy of structural levels, each building on the levels below